A regular look at your investment process is important, so that you are sure that the approach of the past should be carried forward. To do so effectively, you might need a helping hand.
How do you go about making investment decisions? What range of information do you consider? Some simple thoughts on how you could do it better.
What assumptions should lie at the heart of the investment plans for organizations and individuals? We need a radical rethinking of the way business is done.
When it comes to evaluating investment strategies and managers, the degree of transparency that you have makes all the difference in the world.
Sometimes how an asset management firm approaches a particular sector speaks volumes to its overall process. You can probably guess which sector serves as today's Exhibit A.
The night sky is full of them -- and so are the pages of investment publications. But the game is changing when it comes to the most famous research ratings system.
Moisten your finger, stick it into the investment wind, and figure out which way to go. That's how much of the capital in the market is allocated.
Lumping similar kinds of investment vehicles together for performance comparison is the way of the world. But there's an important dimension that's often forgotten.
The computer screens of investors are now full of awful images. Watch what those investors do in response (and versus what they said they'd do).
The markets have become more and more computerized, automating decision making in all kinds of ways. What does that mean for evaluating investment styles and managers?
= one of tom's favorites